IdeaLog
Push back on the media’s normalizing of Trump
Posted on April 16, 2025
The media has been normalizing Trump for the past decade. They do this, in part, by inventing semi-rational policy explanations for irrational proposals. We should push back.
Here are three examples:
Tariffs and other economic policies
News stories and even some otherwise intelligent commentators talk about Trump’s tariff war with the rest of the world as it were an economic strategy. Usually, they assert that the purpose of these tariffs is to build domestic manufacturing capacity. That’s absurd.
First, who is going to invest billions of dollars building factories in the United States based upon tariffs that might disappear tomorrow? Trump has already flip-flopped repeatedly, making most of his announced tariffs disappear. It would be irresponsible for a company to rely on such a flimsy reed, and especially because, once a factory was built based on a particular tariff, that company would be helpless against future attempts at presidential pressure.
Second, and more important, economic policy is simply not his motive. Trump told a group of Republicans “that foreign leaders were essentially groveling to avoid the new tariffs,” as CNN put it. Said Trump: “These countries are calling us up. Kissing my ass. They are dying to make a deal… Please, please sir, make a deal. I’ll do anything sir.”
These tariffs, like the attacks on universities, law firms and the mainstream media (e.g. the AP), are a form of hostage taking and demanding ransoms. And the ransoms are not a matter of policy for the benefit of our country, they are intended to benefit Trump by increasing his personal power.
Greenland and other foreign policies
The New York Times recently ran a front page story claiming that Trump’s plan for Greenland is “persuasion not invasion.” But this normalizing premise was not supported by any credible evidence in the story. To the contrary, Trump said: “One way or the other, we’re going to get it.” Isn’t it obvious that the only way he’ll “get” Greenland is by invasion? That’s the only way he can “get” the Panama Canal or Canada. Again, this is hostage taking. Trump doesn’t care about the policy of getting access to rare minerals in Greenland (or Ukraine), he just wants to be offered a ransom.
Look at it this way: Trump is America’s Brexit. Like Brexit, an “America First” policy would be a decoupling from former allies, which would have to be based on the idiotic premise that we can do better without them. “America First” would hurt the U.S. in both the short- and long-term, just as Brexit hurt Great Britain. But Trump really doesn’t care about the policy of “America First,” he only cares about himself. There is no other policy.
Education and other domestic policies
Just as one example, this Washington Post editorial is based on the premise that the Trump Administration cares whether or not it is sending education policy “back to the states.” That premise is absurd. There is no conservative federalism or “small government” philosophy underlying this Administration. DOGE, for example, has nothing to do with eliminating waste, fraud or abuse. Rather, DOGE is now the main source of federal waste, fraud and abuse.
Trump and his right-wing extremist allies believe that, by destroying the federal bureaucracy, they increase their own power. And perhaps they are right. Certainly, every time some law firm, university or media company bows down to Trump, it does tend to increase his power. As Neville Chamberlain proved almost 90 years ago, appeasement doesn’t work. It only leads to more aggression.
MAGA’s Musk mistake
Posted on April 2, 2025
Tuesday’s elections brought good news. MAGA candidates ran at least 10 points behind 2024 Trump votes and, perhaps best of all, Elon Musk dragged them all down. How should you use this in messaging?...
How to deal with a bully in the White House
Posted on March 18, 2025
Trump is doing horrible things. But, like any bully, much of his perceived power is based on threats that he doesn’t carry out. By reacting to every threat, no matter how absurd, Democrats are...
Trump is pushing us toward a Republican recession
Posted on March 5, 2025
“It seems almost unavoidable that we are headed for a deep, deep recession,” says Jesse Rothstein, former Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor. Whether or not the situation is that bad, it’s time...
To respond to Trump, simplify your messages
Posted on February 18, 2025
There is too much going on and people are overwhelmed by it. If you want to have any impact at all, don’t try to answer everything. Group issues together and respond broadly. Keep in...
States and localities shouldn’t cooperate with ICE detainers
Posted on February 4, 2025
Right now, some Democrats are trying to “move to the right” on immigration. Some are supporting legislation to undo “sanctuary” policies that have blocked state or local law enforcement from cooperating with ICE detainers....
Lessons of the 2024 election, part three
Posted on January 21, 2025
The fundamental reason why our side lost in November is that a small but decisive percentage of Americans never heard our arguments – specifically, people who normally would support Democrats but rely on social...
Lessons of the 2024 election, part two
Posted on January 9, 2025
If we don’t understand the November election defeat, then we can’t know what to fix. Yet, our side does not understand. The Democrats’ two month blamefest has focused almost entirely on messaging. But the...
Lessons of the 2024 election, part one
Posted on December 10, 2024
There were two major problems in the 2024 election, the overall message and the overall communications strategy. Today, let’s talk about the failure of Democrats to win the most important issue—the economy. As James...
No, the solution is not to move toward the center
Posted on November 27, 2024
Harris did not lose because Democrats are too progressive, too woke, or too soft on immigration. In fact, this was not an election about liberal versus conservative, it was about truth versus lies and—let...