The media is bungling the facts about immigration

Posted on July 18, 2018

The media is doing a particularly lousy job of covering the Trump Administration’s persecution of non-white immigrants.

Although there are plenty of well-researched stories about the horrors of “zero tolerance,” family separation and imprisoning children in cages, the general public knows nothing about the big picture—because it’s not considered “news.” A few examples:

(1) Unauthorized immigration has been negligible since the beginning of the Obama Administration. The total number of unauthorized immigrants in the United States increased from about 3.5 million in 1990 to about 12.2 million in 2007. Once the Great Recession struck America, about a million unauthorized immigrants left the U.S. and the total number has remained fairly steady at around 11.3 million from 2009 to the present. See the latest estimates from the Pew Research Center, here.

In short, there is no policy problem. Compared to the Clinton and Bush Administrations, unauthorized border crossings have been negligible. A border wall would do virtually nothing. The right-wing story about immigrants is a calculated, cruel fantasy.

So who are the white “nationalists” hating? There are about 44 million immigrants in the United States. One-fourth are unauthorized but have lived as our neighbors in the U.S. for ten to thirty years and three-fourths are legally authorized to be here. That’s who. It’s not about legal status, and certainly not crime or terrorism, it’s about race.

(2) A huge portion of the immigrants imprisoned by the Trump Administration have legal claims as asylum seekers. The media has been calling them “migrants,” which is false. “Migrant” refers in general to someone who is fine in their country of origin but who seeks to emigrate for a better job. (Prior to the Great Recession, many employers encouraged migrants in order to get cheap labor.) And this is how Americans think of the imprisoned immigrants.

But most of them are seeking asylum. Asylum seekers are people who are being persecuted in their country of origin. They sincerely fear to return.

Based largely on the consequences of many nations (especially the U.S.) turning away Jewish refugees before the Second World War, both international law and U.S. statutes provide a legal right to seek asylum. Under U.S. law, a person has up to one year from his or her date of arrival to apply for asylum. It is a disgrace to treat asylum-seekers like criminals—they aren’t.

In fact, it is the Trump Administration that is breaking the law. Earlier this month, a federal court in Washington, D.C. declared that immigration authorities are violating their own rules by denying parole to asylum-seekers who have demonstrated a “credible fear” of returning to their countries of origin.

(3) The Trump Administration has declared war on all kinds of non-white refugees. The Conversation makes the case better than I can:

The mind boggles at the scale and speed of the rollbacks to accessing asylum, humanitarian protection and residence rights, among them:

Withdrawing “temporary protected status” protections against deportation for 200,000 Salvadoreans, plus Haitians, Sudanese and Nicaraguans, living in the United States.

Intervening to undermine asylum protections for women and others fleeing persecution at the hands of non-state individuals, including abusive spouses.

Stepping up prosecutions of unlawful entries across the U.S.-Mexico border.

Turning back asylum-seekers at ports of entry.

Hollowing out protections for children not at immediate risk of human trafficking for sexual, forced labor or other forms of exploitation.

Prosecuting parents who pay agents to bring their children to the U.S.

Prosecuting everyone who enters the U.S. without preauthorization.

The most shocking of these recent changes is perhaps the Trump administration’s order to deliberately remove children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border. Again, this action was enabled through expanding the uses — and moral and legal thresholds — of immigration detention.

(4) Trump surely does not hate immigrants, it’s people of color he’s targeted. This is an obvious point, albeit one never made by the mainstream media. Donald Trump does not hate immigrants, he is married to one. He also does not have a problem with immigrants who violate immigration rules—Melania broke those rules by repeatedly working in the U.S. before obtaining a work visa. And Trump does not really oppose “chain migration” because that’s how Melania’s parents are (almost certainly) legal permanent residents.

Trump’s monstrous policies are not about immigration, they’re about race.

SHARE

Supreme Court will likely put legislators in charge of abortion rights

Posted on July 4, 2018

While our abortion rights allies try to make the best of the upcoming Supreme Court confirmation battle, we must prepare for the likelihood that the nominee will be confirmed and that Roe v. Wade...

SHARE

Both race and class are essential in a progressive narrative

Posted on June 20, 2018

If there is one certainty about the 2018 General Elections, it’s that the debate will be ugly. Donald Trump will be a central issue, whether or not local candidates want that. There will be...

SHARE

Fake news versus real news

Posted on June 6, 2018

A democracy cannot function when truth is irrelevant to political debate, when facts are manufactured at will, when voter persuasion is no more elevated than a schoolyard shouting match. But we’ve sunk that low....

SHARE

Debate proactively!

Posted on May 24, 2018

Over the past twenty years, conservatives have generally trounced progressives at the game of message framing. The right wing identifies specific political goals and then its spokespeople conscientiously repeat poll-tested language—over and over—to shape...

SHARE

The housing crisis of 2018

Posted on May 9, 2018

Home prices are higher now than at the peak of the housing bubble in 2006. Since the bottom of the housing market in late 2011, the median price of new homes has increased by...

SHARE

The hypocrisy of the opioid debate

Posted on April 25, 2018

Days ago, the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee unanimously approved a bill called the “Opioid Crisis Response Act of 2018.” Since this is a bipartisan measure, it’s no surprise that the...

SHARE

It sure seems like a cover-up

Posted on April 11, 2018

On October 1, 2017, a gunman named Stephen Paddock killed 58 and injured more than 850 people who were attending a country music concert in Las Vegas. The murderer fired semiautomatic assault weapons, equipped...

SHARE

We don’t need to overturn the Second Amendment to enact strong gun laws

Posted on March 28, 2018

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens recently wrote an op-ed calling for a constitutional amendment to repeal the Second Amendment. And he is correct that Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority ruling in District of...

SHARE

The unholy misuse of “freedom” of religion

Posted on March 15, 2018

The radical right is engaged in political warfare to impose fundamentalist Christianity on all Americans. To be more specific, they are trying to enact laws and policies to: Allow businesspeople to refuse service to...

SHARE