Our values: Freedom, liberty, fundamental rights, fundamental fairness, basic rights, constitutional rights, personal privacy, justice, equal opportunity, fairness, stopping discrimination and government intrusion
Our vision: Our nation was founded and built upon the self-evident truth that everyone is created equal. That ideal calls us to defend liberty and justice for all people, with no exceptions. In the 21st century, three policies are of foremost importance: (1) outlaw discrimination based on race, gender, age, disability, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation or gender identity; (2) guarantee fundamental fairness for immigrants; and (3) protect our privacy from intrusion by governments or businesses, including the collection, use and sale of data without individuals’ active consent.
It has been more than half a century since the civil rights movement, aided by the Warren Supreme Court, started a revolution against discrimination. That cause endures. Women and people of color continue to be underrepresented in government and other places of power, so some jurisdictions implement affirmative action while others promote more aggressive enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, especially in claims for fair and equal pay. Too often police wrongly employ racial profiling. Most states and localities currently do not protect LGBT people from discrimination in employment and other areas, but there are many ongoing efforts to correct that. Progressives must beat back efforts to legalize discrimination, like policies that target Muslim Americans and laws which invite businesses to discriminate against our gay and lesbian neighbors.
More than 40 million American residents are foreign-born. About three-fourths of these are authorized residents, and yet, whether authorized or not, they often face discrimination. Millions more Americans were born in the U.S. but face discrimination because they look foreign. Progressive states and cities are responding by limiting government inquiries into immigration status, refusing some federal immigration detainer requests, authorizing driver’s licenses regardless of immigration status, making government ID cards available to all, and providing information about government requirements, programs and services in various languages.
Many government agencies, including state and local law enforcement, are amassing vast databases about people’s personal and business relationships, where they have been, and more. Progressives are starting to push back by requiring warrants for law enforcement to access the most sensitive personal data and limiting how long data can be kept by police. In some cases, governments are limiting the collection, sale or use of government-generated data, especially information about schoolchildren.
FEATURED POLICIES FOR 2019
When immigrants believe that state or local law enforcement agents are involved in the enforcement of federal immigration law, immigrants—fearing harassment or deportation—simply decline to report crimes or suspicious activity. The result is twofold: criminals see immigrants as easy prey, and offenders who could have been caught remain on the streets, putting everyone at risk of becoming the next victim. Assigning the role of immigration law enforcer to local police both overburdens law enforcement and increases the risk of racial profiling. And local police usually lack the training needed to enforce our nation’s complex web of immigration laws. States and localities should adopt policies prohibiting government inquiry into immigration status unless otherwise required by superseding law.
States, cities and counties have routinely included language in government contracts that prevent certain types of discrimination, usually based on a few factors such as race, religion and national origin. Because the federal government is currently rolling back fundamental civil rights protections, it is important for states and localities to step in and do all they can. And one thing they can do is expand the types of discrimination forbidden to government contractors, adding factors such as gender, marital status, sexual orientation, and gender identity or expression.
As a result of historic factors and, sometimes, outright discrimination, the employees in public agencies are often disproportionately white and male. Greater diversity is valuable not only to promote equity, build respect for others and better reflect the population served, but also to increase the cultural competence of any office which inevitably improves the services provided. Diversity is a strength which can be encouraged through the Public Agency Diversity Act.
Thirty-two million Americans have been the victims of racial profiling, according to an Amnesty International report. Racial profiling and racially motivated policing result in a breakdown of communication between police and the public, undermining law enforcement’s ability to ensure public safety. Cities, counties and states can combat these practices by prohibiting the selection of individuals for interrogations, searches and frisks based on race or other factors. Law enforcement should be required to train officers to recognize the difference between good policing and misguided stereotyping.
Protect LGBT fairness
Over one-third of lesbian and gay people have experienced workplace discrimination and about one-sixth have lost a job because of their sexual orientation. Sadly, over half of states and most cities do not ban discrimination against LGBT individuals. The LGBT Fairness Act prohibits discrimination in employment, public accommodations, education, credit and housing.
Prevent a constitutional convention
In late 2017, Wisconsin became the 28th state to call for an unprecedented federal constitutional convention. Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, a national convention occurs if two-thirds, or 34, of the states formally ask for it. This effort, led by right-wing extremists, could result in the loss of our fundamental constitutional rights. Many states approved convention resolutions long ago and should now pass a Constitutional Convention Rescission Resolution, as Maryland did in 2017.
Hate crime prevention
In recent months, we have seen a wave of violence and threats of violence against people of color and anyone who supports them. Radical Right intimidation tactics will likely increase. Forty-five states already have some type of Hate Crime Prevention Act. Our model protects a full range of hate crimes targets, includes civil litigation, and is unique in covering violence against abortion providers and patients, and against unauthorized immigrants.
Threats against immigrants
Because of the new Administration’s intention to deport millions of immigrants, many will be particularly vulnerable to extortion. The Prevent Extortion of Immigrants Act specifies that it is illegal to gain something of value by threatening to expose someone’s unauthorized immigration status. Four states have already adopted such a law.
Limits on license plate databases
All over the nation, police agencies are using license plate readers that tell them exactly which vehicle was at a certain location at a certain date and time. Several states have enacted a version of the License Plate Privacy Act to limit the amount of time government agencies can hold on to those records.
Birth certificate after sex change
People who have undergone transitional surgeries often run into trouble when trying to get legal documents like marriage licenses or driver’s licenses. States are enacting legislation to allow a transgender person to obtain an amended birth certificate reflecting a change in both sexual designation and name.